Write of a time that someone tried to persuade you by using …

Write of a time that someone tried to persuade you by using one of the 17 logical fallacies described in your first power point? Name which specific fallacy of the 17 in your essay. Which of the logical fallacies were they using trying to persuade you? What was the topic? Did it work? (Minimum 3 paragraphs) 2. Tradition is not always right. 5. Do not force people into limited or false options.

Title: Analyzing an Attempted Persuasion Using the False Dilemma Fallacy

Introduction:

Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that detract from the validity and soundness of arguments. Recognizing and understanding these fallacies is essential in evaluating the validity of persuasion techniques employed in various situations. In this essay, I recount an incident where an individual attempted to persuade me by using the false dilemma fallacy from the 17 logical fallacies identified in the first PowerPoint presentation. Specifically, this encounter pertains to the fallacy of forcing limited or false options, also known as the false dilemma fallacy.

The False Dilemma Fallacy:

The false dilemma fallacy, as described in fallacy number five, refers to the act of presenting only two options when several alternatives exist. This fallacy oversimplifies complex issues by reducing them to binary choices, thereby limiting the range of potential solutions that could be considered. False dilemmas appeal to emotional responses, often leading individuals to believe that they must choose between two extreme positions, neither of which may adequately represent their views.

The Encounter:

The topic of the encounter was related to the implementation of reforms in a university curriculum. I was advocating for a more inclusive and multidisciplinary approach, aiming to broaden students’ perspectives and enhance critical thinking skills. During a committee meeting, one of the members, who had a classical approach rooted in tradition, attempted to persuade me against my proposed reforms by using the false dilemma fallacy. He positioned his argument as a dichotomy between maintaining the existing curriculum and embracing my proposed changes, without considering any alternative options.

The Persuasion Attempt:

The individual argued that by implementing the proposed changes, we would risk abandoning the university’s long-standing traditions and losing our reputation for academic excellence. He presented the false dilemma that we could either stay true to tradition or jeopardize our university’s standing in the academic community. By framing the argument in this way, he attempted to force me into a limited set of options that excluded any middle ground or alternative solutions.

My counterargument highlighted that embracing tradition solely for the sake of tradition is not always the best approach. I provided examples of successful universities that have adapted their curricula to incorporate new educational trends while still maintaining their reputation. Additionally, I emphasized the importance of staying current and relevant in the rapidly evolving academic landscape. Despite these counterarguments, the individual persisted in using the false dilemma fallacy, suggesting no other choice but to uphold the traditional curriculum or risk significant consequences.

Evaluation:

While the individual’s use of the false dilemma fallacy was skillfully executed and intended to sway my opinion, it ultimately did not succeed in persuading me to abandon my proposed reforms. By recognizing and understanding the logical fallacy he employed, I was able to maintain a critical and analytical perspective on the issue at hand. I remained steadfast in my belief that the proposed changes would benefit the students, and I consistently countered the false dilemma presented.

Conclusion:

Understanding logical fallacies, such as the false dilemma fallacy, is crucial in recognizing attempts at persuasion that may be built on flawed reasoning. One must be cautious when presented with a limited set of options, questioning whether other alternatives exist or if the choices are being oversimplified for persuasive purposes. By remaining aware of logical fallacies, we can evaluate arguments more effectively, avoid being swayed by emotional appeals, and make informed decisions. In this specific encounter, recognizing the false dilemma fallacy allowed me to evaluate the merit of the proposed reforms within a broader perspective, ultimately leading me to reject the attempt at persuasion.