Write a 350- to 700-word summary of the personality assessme…

Write a 350- to 700-word summary of the personality assessment methods discussed in Ch. 11 of Psychology: An Introduction. 1. A discussion of how personality assessments and personality theories correspond. In other words, identify which theories relate to which assessments. 2. Identification of the online test as either an objective or projective test. 3. Discuss your opinion regarding the accuracy of this objective or projective type of test. 4. Discuss the test’s accuracy regarding your personality.


Personality assessment methods play a crucial role in understanding an individual’s unique characteristics and traits. In Chapter 11 of the book “Psychology: An Introduction,” various personality assessment methods are discussed, each corresponding to specific personality theories. This summary will provide an overview of these methods, identify the nature of online tests, and discuss the accuracy of objective and projective tests.

Firstly, it is important to understand the connection between personality assessments and personality theories. Personality assessments are designed to measure and evaluate an individual’s personality traits, behavior patterns, and psychological characteristics. These assessments are influenced by different personality theories that attempt to explain and categorize human personality. Some prominent theories include the psychodynamic theory, the behaviorist theory, and the humanistic theory.

The psychodynamic theory, proposed by Sigmund Freud, focuses on the unconscious mind and the innate drives and conflicts that influence behavior. This theory corresponds to the projective tests, which aim to uncover unconscious thoughts and desires by requiring individuals to interpret ambiguous stimuli. Examples of projective tests include the Rorschach inkblot test and the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT).

On the other hand, the behaviorist theory, derived from the works of B.F. Skinner and John Watson, emphasizes the role of learning and environmental factors in shaping personality. For behaviorists, personality is a result of conditioning and reinforcement. Objective tests, such as self-report questionnaires and rating scales, align with this theory as they directly measure observable behaviors and traits. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a widely used objective test that assesses various dimensions of personality.

The humanistic theory, developed by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow, focuses on the idea of self-actualization and personal growth. It emphasizes the importance of subjective experience and individual perceptions. Personality assessments associated with this theory aim to capture an individual’s self-concept and subjective experiences. These assessments often involve self-report measures, such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the California Psychological Inventory (CPI).

Moving on to online tests, it is important to determine whether they are objective or projective in nature. Online tests can fall into either category, depending on their design and the type of questions or stimuli used. Objective online tests typically involve self-report questionnaires that ask individuals to rate themselves on various dimensions of personality. These tests provide scores that reflect an individual’s standing on different personality traits. In contrast, projective online tests present participants with ambiguous stimuli or situations, which they must interpret or respond to in order to reveal unconscious aspects of their personality.

Opinions regarding the accuracy of objective and projective tests vary among researchers and professionals. Objective tests are generally considered more reliable and valid in assessing personality traits. They provide standardized measures and are based on a large body of research. However, criticisms of objective tests include the possibility of faking or biased responding, as well as the limited ability to capture complex aspects of personality.

Projective tests, on the other hand, have been criticized for their lack of reliability and objectivity. The interpretation of ambiguous stimuli in projective tests is subjective and open to different interpretations. Critics argue that projective tests often rely on the skill and expertise of the examiner, which can introduce biases and inconsistencies. However, projective tests can offer valuable insights into unconscious aspects of personality that may not be captured by objective measures.

Regarding the accuracy of online tests in assessing personality, it is important to consider their limitations. While online tests can provide some useful information, they should not be regarded as definitive assessments of personality. Factors such as the self-presentation bias and the absence of a trained professional to interpret the results can affect the accuracy and validity of online tests. In-person assessments conducted by trained psychologists or experts are generally considered more reliable and accurate in capturing the complexity of an individual’s personality.

In conclusion, personality assessment methods play a significant role in understanding human personality. The methods correspond to different personality theories, ranging from the psychodynamic theory to the behaviorist and humanistic theories. Online tests can be objective or projective in nature, with objective tests generally considered more accurate and reliable. The accuracy of online tests in personality assessment remains debatable, as limitations such as biased responses and the absence of professional interpretation can affect their validity. Ultimately, in-person assessments conducted by trained professionals are considered more accurate in capturing the multidimensional aspects of an individual’s personality.