What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolvi…

What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal standards and Dr. Yeung’s obligations to stakeholders? 5. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects? Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it

Dr. Yeung, as a healthcare professional, is faced with an ethical dilemma regarding the use of an experimental drug on a patient. In this case, the patient’s condition is deteriorating, and there is limited effectiveness of existing treatments. Dr. Yeung must consider the ethical alternatives available to her in resolving this dilemma.

One possible ethical alternative for Dr. Yeung is to seek the patient’s informed consent to use the experimental drug. This option aligns with the principle of beneficence, which requires healthcare professionals to act in the best interest of their patients. By providing the patient with all relevant information about the experimental drug, including its potential risks and benefits, Dr. Yeung allows the patient to make an autonomous and informed decision about their treatment.

Another alternative for Dr. Yeung is to consult with a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals and ethics experts. This approach emphasizes the principle of justice, ensuring that decisions are made through a transparent and inclusive process. By involving other professionals in the decision-making process, Dr. Yeung can benefit from their expertise and perspectives, ultimately arriving at a more ethical and well-informed decision.

Furthermore, Dr. Yeung could consider the option of engaging in further research on the experimental drug. This alternative aligns with the principle of integrity, which requires healthcare professionals to uphold and promote the highest standards of scientific research. By conducting further research on the drug’s safety and effectiveness, Dr. Yeung can gather additional evidence to support her decision and ensure the well-being of her patient.

To determine the alternative that best reflects the Ethics Code’s aspirational principle and enforceable standards, as well as legal standards and Dr. Yeung’s obligations to stakeholders, a thorough analysis of these factors is necessary. The Ethics Code of the relevant healthcare profession serves as a key reference in guiding ethical decision-making, outlining the ethical principles and standards that professionals should abide by. Additionally, legal standards and regulations must be considered to ensure compliance with the law.

In this particular case, the best alternative would be to seek the patient’s informed consent and involve a multidisciplinary team in the decision-making process. This approach adheres to the principles of beneficence, justice, and integrity. By obtaining the patient’s informed consent, Dr. Yeung respects their autonomy and ensures that the patient is fully aware of the potential risks and benefits of the experimental drug. Involving a multidisciplinary team promotes transparency and inclusivity, enhancing the decision’s ethical and scientific validity.

To ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects, Dr. Yeung should take several steps. Firstly, she must ensure that the informed consent process is conducted appropriately. This entails providing the patient with all relevant information, discussing any potential risks and benefits, and addressing any questions or concerns the patient may have. The consent process should be documented to demonstrate that proper procedures were followed.

Additionally, Dr. Yeung should continuously monitor the patient’s response to the experimental drug and assess its effectiveness. This can be done through regular medical examinations, laboratory tests, and consultations with the patient. By closely monitoring the patient, Dr. Yeung can evaluate whether the chosen treatment is achieving the desired outcomes and make adjustments if necessary.

Furthermore, Dr. Yeung should engage in ongoing communication and collaboration with the multidisciplinary team involved in the decision-making process. This includes regular meetings to discuss the patient’s progress, share information, and address any emerging ethical or clinical concerns. Maintaining open lines of communication and fostering a collaborative environment ensures that all stakeholders are informed and actively participate in monitoring the decision’s effects.

Overall, resolving ethical dilemmas in healthcare requires careful consideration of various alternatives and adherence to ethical principles, legal standards, and professional obligations. By involving patients in the decision-making process, seeking input from other professionals, and engaging in ongoing monitoring and assessment, healthcare professionals like Dr. Yeung can make ethically sound decisions that prioritize the well-being of their patients and uphold the highest standards of care.