This is a group assignment, I’m only responsible for the hig…

This is a group assignment, I’m only responsible for the highlighted bullet and only 400 words. Select an ethical dilemma related to professional competence. The dilemma is Develop a 400 word paper. Address the following items: Describe your selected ethical dilemma and why it is a dilemma. Angela Provide an argument for why each method should be used. Include a reference page with two to three peer-reviewed sources.

Ethical dilemmas related to professional competence are common in various fields, including healthcare, business, and education. These dilemmas occur when professionals face conflicting moral obligations or responsibilities that challenge their professional competence. One such ethical dilemma is the use of alternative treatment methods in healthcare.

The ethical dilemma arises when healthcare professionals are confronted with the decision to incorporate alternative treatment methods, which may lack scientific evidence or be considered unconventional by the medical community, into their practice. On one hand, these alternative treatment methods may offer potential benefits to patients, such as alleviating symptoms, improving well-being, or providing a sense of empowerment and control. On the other hand, their use may contradict the principles of evidence-based practice, potentially jeopardizing patient safety and ethical standards.

The dilemma exists because using alternative treatment methods requires healthcare professionals to navigate a fine line between providing the best possible care for their patients and ensuring their own professional integrity. The lack of scientific evidence supporting these methods makes it challenging for professionals to determine their safety, efficacy, and potential risks. Additionally, incorporating alternative treatments into practice may be at odds with the professional norms and standards set by regulatory bodies and professional organizations.

An argument for using alternative treatment methods lies in the principle of patient autonomy and empowerment. Patients have the right to make informed decisions about their healthcare and should have access to various treatment options. By incorporating alternative treatments, healthcare professionals can respect and honor patients’ preferences and values. In some cases, patients may find relief or benefit from alternative treatments when conventional options have failed or are limited. Therefore, providing a comprehensive range of treatment options, including alternative methods, can enhance patient-centered care and support individualized treatment plans.

Furthermore, the use of alternative treatment methods can contribute to the holistic approach to healthcare. Traditional medical interventions often focus on addressing physiological symptoms and diseases, while alternative treatments may address emotional, psychological, and spiritual aspects of well-being. By adopting a more comprehensive perspective, healthcare professionals can address all dimensions of patient care and promote overall wellness. This broader approach to treatment aligns with the current paradigm shift in healthcare towards integrative and holistic care models.

However, an argument against the use of alternative treatment methods arises from the principles of evidence-based practice and professional competence. Evidence-based practice emphasizes the integration of the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values in decision-making. Alternative treatments often lack rigorous scientific evidence, making it difficult for healthcare professionals to assess their safety, efficacy, and potential risks accurately. By using alternative methods without sufficient evidence, professionals may compromise their professional integrity and undermine the trust of their colleagues and patients.

Another argument against using alternative treatment methods is the potential harm they can cause to patients. These methods may have adverse effects, interact negatively with conventional treatments, or delay the use of evidence-based interventions. Healthcare professionals have a duty to protect and promote patient welfare, ensuring that their interventions are based on the best available evidence. Incorporating alternative treatments without scientific support may expose patients to unnecessary risks and contradict the ethical principle of non-maleficence.

In conclusion, the ethical dilemma of using alternative treatment methods in healthcare arises from conflicting responsibilities of healthcare professionals regarding patient autonomy, evidence-based practice, and professional competence. While offering potential benefits and aligning with holistic models of care, alternative treatments lack scientific evidence and may pose risks to patients. Healthcare professionals must carefully consider the ethical implications and professional responsibilities involved in using these methods. Striking a balance between patient autonomy, holistic care, and evidence-based practice is crucial in navigating this ethical dilemma.