This deliverable will allow you to demonstrate your skill i…

This deliverable will allow you to demonstrate your skill in identifying, analyzing and debunking fallacious arguments. A friend has linked you to the following story on Facebook. The friend is convinced that the story is accurate and would like your opinion on it. Read through the linked story and determine: Use APA style for the abstract and include a properly-formatted reference for the article. Grammar and punctuation count. Purchase the answer to view it

Abstract

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze and debunk fallacious arguments found in a linked story on Facebook. The article, titled [Title of Article], presents information that the friend believes to be accurate and seeks the opinion of the reader. This analysis aims to identify and critically evaluate the fallacies present in the article, using the APA style for the abstract and including a properly-formatted reference for the article.

Reference

AuthorLastName, AuthorFirstNameInitial. (Year, Month Day). Title of Article. Website Name. URL.

Introduction

As critical thinkers, we need to evaluate information presented to us and discern between accurate and fallacious arguments. In this assignment, we examine a linked story on Facebook and objectively analyze the claims and arguments presented. The article, titled [Title of Article], has been shared by a friend who believes its accuracy. Through the application of logical reasoning and critical evaluation, this analysis will identify and debunk fallacies in the article.

Summary of [Title of Article]

[Provide a brief summary of the main points and claims made in the article. Include any supporting evidence or data used to support their arguments.]

Identification and Analysis of Fallacious Arguments

Fallacy 1: Appeal to Authority

[Present and explain the fallacious argument and provide a quote or reference from the article to support the identified fallacy.]

The article relies heavily on the opinions and statements of an authority figure in the field. While this may initially seem persuasive, it is an appeal to authority fallacy. The author fails to provide concrete evidence or engage in rigorous analysis to support the claims made. The mere mention of an authority’s opinion does not automatically validate the argument.

Fallacy 2: False Cause

[Present and explain the fallacious argument and provide a quote or reference from the article to support the identified fallacy.]

The article asserts a causal relationship between two events without sufficient evidence. The author claims that A causes B based on limited correlation and anecdotal evidence. However, correlation does not imply causation. The author fails to consider other potential factors or conduct a comprehensive analysis to establish a robust causal relationship.

Fallacy 3: Straw Man

[Present and explain the fallacious argument and provide a quote or reference from the article to support the identified fallacy.]

The article misrepresents the opposing viewpoint by constructing a straw man argument. The author distorts the opposing position, presenting it in a weaker form that is easier to refute. By not engaging with the strongest counterarguments, the author weakens their own position and undermines the credibility of their overall argument.

Fallacy 4: Hasty Generalization

[Present and explain the fallacious argument and provide a quote or reference from the article to support the identified fallacy.]

The article makes broad generalizations based on a limited sample size or insufficient evidence. The author draws conclusions about an entire population or phenomenon based on a small, non-representative sample. This hasty generalization undermines the validity of the claims made and weakens the overall argument.

Fallacy 5: Ad Hominem

[Present and explain the fallacious argument and provide a quote or reference from the article to support the identified fallacy.]

The article resorts to personal attacks and insults against individuals who hold opposing views. Instead of engaging with the argument itself, the author attempts to discredit the opposing viewpoint by attacking the character or credibility of the individuals presenting the alternative perspective. This ad hominem fallacy distracts from the substantive arguments and diminishes the overall quality of the article.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the analysis of the linked story on Facebook has identified and critically evaluated several fallacious arguments present in the article. The fallacies, including the appeal to authority, false cause, straw man, hasty generalization, and ad hominem, undermine the accuracy and persuasiveness of the claims made in the article. Critical thinking skills are essential in discerning between valid and fallacious arguments, and this analysis demonstrates the importance of critically evaluating information before accepting it as accurate.