Review the two cases. Based on the information you learned f…

Review the two cases. Based on the information you learned from your assigned weekly readings from your textbook, respond to the following: Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. If you refer to research information, cite sources applying APA standards. THE TWO CASE FOR YOUR REVIEW ARE ATTACHED AND FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT YOU MUST USE THE   remember to utilize Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it

The two cases provided for review are attached. In these cases, we will analyze and evaluate the provided information using the knowledge gained from assigned weekly readings. We will focus on understanding the issues, identifying relevant theories and concepts, and formulating an initial response.

In Case 1, the primary issue revolves around corporate governance and ethical conduct within a multinational corporation. There are allegations of bribery, corruption, and violations of ethical standards by senior executives. This case raises concerns related to the accountability and responsibility of top management, as well as the potential impact on the company’s reputation and stakeholders.

To respond to this case, we can refer to the readings on corporate governance and ethics. According to Jones (1991), ethical decision-making is influenced by individual, organizational, and societal factors. In this case, it is crucial to consider the personal values and moral reasoning of the executives involved, as well as the organizational culture and norms that may have potentially influenced their behavior.

In addition, we can draw upon the concepts of corporate social responsibility (CSR), which involves the integration of ethical and social considerations into business practices. Carroll (1991) proposes a four-part model of CSR, consisting of economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary responsibilities. The executives’ actions in this case seem to violate both the ethical and legal dimensions of CSR, thereby raising significant concerns.

Case 2 revolves around a strategic decision made by a retail company to enter a new market. The decision to enter the online market, however, seems to be met with resistance from various stakeholders, including traditional brick-and-mortar retailers and even some employees. The key issues in this case pertain to organizational change, resistance, and the management of stakeholder relationships.

To analyze this case, we can refer to the readings on strategic management and organizational change. The decision to enter the online market represents a strategic change that can be met with resistance from various sources. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are six common sources of resistance, including fear of the unknown, lack of trust, and perceived loss of power. It would be insightful to explore whether any of these sources are driving the resistance observed in Case 2.

Further, stakeholder management theories can provide insights into how to handle the concerns of various stakeholders. Freeman (1984) argues that stakeholders should be given voice, and their interests should be taken into account when making strategic decisions. Thus, the company in Case 2 should consider engaging in dialogues with traditional retailers and employees to address their concerns and find mutually beneficial solutions.

Overall, these cases present complex issues that can be explored using concepts and theories from corporate governance, ethics, strategic management, and organizational change. By applying these frameworks, we can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by the companies in question, as well as potential strategies for addressing these challenges.