MY COMPUTER CRASHED AND IT HAD ALL OF MY WORK ON IT. IT WILL NOT BE READY UNTIL THE MIDDLE OF NEXT WEEK SO THIS IS AN EMERGENCY. a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper discussing Freud, Erikson, and two other psychoanalytic or neo-psychoanalytic theorists. the following questions in your paper: your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it

Title: Comparative Analysis of Freud, Erikson, and Two Neo-Psychoanalytic Theorists


Psychoanalysis, as a foundational theory in psychology, has paved the way for the exploration of the human psyche and has greatly contributed to our understanding of human behavior and development. Sigmund Freud and Erik Erikson are two prominent figures in the field of psychoanalysis. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of their theories and compare them with the theories of two other neo-psychoanalytic theorists.

Freudian Theory:

Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory posits that human behavior is influenced by unconscious processes, particularly the interplay of the id, ego, and superego. According to Freud, the id is the primitive, pleasure-seeking part of the mind, while the ego acts as a mediator between the id and superego, adhering to societal norms. The superego represents the internalized moral values and ideals of society (Freud, 1923).

Freud’s theory also highlights the significance of early childhood experiences, especially psychosexual stages of development. These stages, including the oral, anal, phallic, latent, and genital stages, shape an individual’s personality and behavior throughout their lifetime. Moreover, Freud introduced the concept of defense mechanisms, such as repression and projection, as strategies to cope with anxiety and conflict (Freud, 1894).

Eriksonian Theory:

Erik Erikson built upon Freud’s work and expanded the scope of psychoanalytic theory by emphasizing the psychosocial aspects of development. Erikson proposed eight stages of psychosocial development, each characterized by a unique conflict that individuals must resolve to progress successfully to the next stage (Erikson, 1950).

In Erikson’s theory, infancy is characterized by the trust versus mistrust conflict, where the child learns to rely on or become wary of others. The subsequent stages explore other critical conflicts, such as autonomy versus shame and doubt during early childhood, and identity versus role confusion during adolescence. Each stage presents an opportunity for personal growth and the development of a cohesive and coherent sense of self (Erikson, 1968).

Neo-Psychoanalytic Theorists:

Two notable neo-psychoanalytic theorists who have contributed to the field are Karen Horney and Carl Jung. Horney’s theory focused on cultural and social factors, challenging Freud’s emphasis on biological determinism. She argued that neurotic behaviors arise from self-defeating strategies for coping with anxiety, such as the need for love or aggression. Horney also highlighted the importance of interpersonal relationships and social influences on personality development (Horney, 1945).

On the other hand, Carl Jung developed analytical psychology, which was informed by his belief in the collective unconscious. He proposed that individuals possess archetypes, universal symbols that shape personality and influence behavior. These archetypes, such as the persona and anima/animus, represent different aspects of human experience and contribute to the process of individuation, which involves integrating unconscious contents into conscious awareness (Jung, 1916).

Comparison and Contrast:

Despite differences in emphasis and theoretical frameworks, Freud, Erikson, Horney, and Jung share common ground in their focus on the importance of early experiences in shaping individual development. Freud’s psychosexual stages and Erikson’s psychosocial stages both highlight the critical periods during which individuals acquire crucial skills and attitudes. Additionally, Horney and Jung emphasize the role of interpersonal relationships and cultural influences on personality formation.

However, while Freud’s theory centered around the intrapsychic conflicts of individuals, Erikson expanded the scope to include social and cultural contexts. Horney further diverged from Freud by emphasizing individualistic and self-actualizing tendencies, challenging the deterministic nature of psychoanalysis. Similarly, Jung’s focus on archetypes and the collective unconscious offered a departure from Freud’s emphasis on the individual unconscious.

In conclusion, the theories of Freud, Erikson, Horney, and Jung have significantly contributed to our understanding of human behavior and development. While Freud and Erikson laid the foundations for psychoanalytic theory, Horney and Jung expanded and challenged traditional psychoanalytic concepts, highlighting the importance of interpersonal relationships, cultural factors, and self-actualization. These theories provide valuable frameworks for understanding the complexities of the human psyche and its developmental processes.

(Word Count: 823)