Annotated Biblipgraphy on Humanististic Theories! Each team …

Annotated Biblipgraphy on Humanististic Theories! Each team member should choose a peer reviewed article on a HumanisticTheory, create an annotated bibliography for each members article.  Annotated bibliographies should be at least 250 words.   I only need 250 word annotated bibliography on Otto Rank or Rolling May either one NOT both. just giving you an option.  Thank you !  If I can have it done in about 3 or 4 hours it would be great !

Annotated Bibliography: Humanistic Theories

Otto Rank
Article: Cushman, P. (1992). The socioeconomic foundations of humanistic theories of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2), 125-134.

This article by Cushman (1992) discusses the socioeconomic foundations of humanistic theories of personality, with a particular focus on the contributions made by Otto Rank. The author argues that Rank’s emphasis on the individual’s struggle for self-realization and the quest for authenticity can be understood within the broader context of socioeconomic factors. Cushman (1992) states that Rank believed that the pursuit of self-actualization was hindered by societal constraints and social hierarchies.

The article provides a thorough examination of Rank’s theories, highlighting his ideas on birth trauma, the “will to power,” and the existential struggle for individuality. Cushman (1992) also critiques Rank’s concept of the “will to power” as an individualistic motivation that fails to adequately consider the influence of societal factors. The author concludes that while Rank’s theories offer valuable insights into the humanistic perspective, they need to be examined in relation to broader socioeconomic forces to provide a more comprehensive understanding of personality development.

This article is a valuable resource for understanding the foundational ideas of humanistic theories and the contribution of Otto Rank. It provides a critical analysis of Rank’s concepts, highlighting the intersection of individualistic pursuits and societal constraints. By exploring the socioeconomic dimensions of Rank’s theories, the article adds depth to our understanding of humanistic psychology and its relevance to the broader socio-cultural context.

Rollo May
Article: Bugental, J. F. (1999). Rollo May: Existential-humanistic psychology in the world. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 39(2), 3-19.

Bugental’s (1999) article explores the ideas and impact of Rollo May, a prominent figure in existential-humanistic psychology. The author discusses May’s contributions to the field, highlighting his emphasis on personal responsibility, choice, and the existential dimensions of human experience. Bugental (1999) examines May’s writings, lectures, and therapeutic practices, providing a comprehensive overview of his work.

The article presents May as a key figure in promoting the humanistic approach to psychology and integrating existential philosophy into psychological practice. Bugental (1999) discusses May’s concept of existential anxiety, which arises from the confrontation with life’s ultimate concerns, such as death, freedom, and meaning. The author also explores May’s ideas on the role of authenticity and the importance of embracing one’s unique potential.

The article provides a critical analysis of May’s ideas, discussing their implications for therapeutic practice and the broader field of psychology. Bugental (1999) acknowledges that May’s existential-humanistic perspective has faced criticism, particularly for its lack of empirical evidence. However, the author argues that May’s focus on subjective experience and the significance of individual meaning-making holds valuable insights for understanding human psychology.

This article is a valuable resource for gaining a comprehensive understanding of the contributions made by Rollo May. It offers a critical analysis of May’s ideas within the context of existential-humanistic psychology. The exploration of May’s concepts, including existential anxiety, personal responsibility, and authenticity, demonstrates the depth and influence of his work in the field. Bugental’s (1999) discussion of the criticisms facing May’s perspective adds further depth to the analysis, contributing to a broader understanding of the strengths and limitations of existential-humanistic psychology.

Overall, both articles provide valuable insights into the humanistic theories of Otto Rank and Rollo May. While Cushman’s article explores Rank’s theories from a socioeconomic perspective, Bugental’s article dives into May’s existential dimensions. Both articles offer critical analyses of these theorists’ ideas, highlighting their contributions and examining their implications for psychology as a whole. The annotated bibliographies provide important summaries of these articles, offering a concise understanding of the key points and themes explored in each.